Specmar 4.5 Build

Mods and custom builds
starbright55
Donator 25
Posts: 58
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2023 4:46 pm
1

Re: Specmar 4.5 Build

#26

Post by starbright55 »

For the most part, these were set up as "outside corner" welds (they weren't perfect, but they were close).


On the front and back of the bench, the bottom of the angle was a little higher than the edge I was welding to
side.jpg
side.jpg (10.39 KiB) Viewed 10301 times
 
At each end, the channel fit up underneath so that when the hatch is set on on top of the angle & channel, the top of the hatch will be flush with the ends.
 
top.jpg
top.jpg (15.01 KiB) Viewed 10301 times
 

The reason for the "divots" in the "boo boo" picture (previous post) is because there were highs and lows as you look along the round profile on the outside corner.
detail.jpg
detail.jpg (9.61 KiB) Viewed 10301 times
 


 
 
 I didn't realize that the picture names are visible - I'll have to me more creative and descriptive in naming them.
 
 
 
 
 
kmorin
Donator 08, 09, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 21, 22, 23, 24 25
Posts: 1857
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 1:37 am
16
Your location: Kenai, AK
Location: Kenai, Alaska

Re: Specmar 4.5 Build

#27

Post by kmorin »

starbright55,
The photo images aren't nearly as clear as the Sketchup (?) images in regard the joints' geometry. Glad you're not welding them flush and sanding those beads off!

In SK'UP (?) which is what it looks like you've used to post these images ? I'd say it was very helpful to go to create some 'scenes' in native Sk'UP- then export to Layout, and set the line wt in the SketchUP Model (tab) to .4x or .2x so the lines are finer? Also I use the Hybrid-type display, so the images have reduced pixelation or 'jaggies' and the lines end up thinner, and more cleanly displayed in the output images or 'snap shots' of the model.

Glad your welds are as shown in the last image 'detail.jpg'; that is the best weld for this material.  However, if you need these welds 'surfaced' to a profile (?) then routing with the appropriate round-over bit is still the best method.

Cheers,
Kevin Morin
Kenai, AK
kmorin
starbright55
Donator 25
Posts: 58
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2023 4:46 pm
1

Re: Specmar 4.5 Build

#28

Post by starbright55 »

Thank you for the router tip! I tried it last night.

I had always planned on using a 1/8" roundover to finish the edge off but I had been trying to use a flap disc to get my 90 first and then move onto the router.

I will look a little more for those settings in sketchup. I can't seem to find the line weight function. I am just using the online version ($100/yr?).  I only pay to be able to import CAD files.  I try to model everything I can so that I know (a) how things will fit and (b) if everything will fit.

I'm jumping ahead (because I haven't started on it) but I've been modeling the console. The compass may need to get pushed forward so that MFD can move up more (yes the the compass is technically too close to the MFD and everything else but it's a "get home" device not something I'll be dead reckoning with to go long distances with accuracy)
console.jpg
console.jpg (28.09 KiB) Viewed 10247 times
 
 
starbright55
Donator 25
Posts: 58
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2023 4:46 pm
1

Re: Specmar 4.5 Build

#29

Post by starbright55 »

Got the console tacked up.  It took a bit to keep everything lined up prior to the first few tacks.
PXL_20241023_151038488.jpg
PXL_20241023_151038488.jpg (126.76 KiB) Viewed 9573 times
 
User avatar
gandrfab
Posts: 636
Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2008 12:33 pm
16
Your location: Edgewater Fl
Location: Edgewater Fl

Re: Specmar 4.5 Build

#30

Post by gandrfab »

I don't have the ability to type out how I have fit up sheet metal.
But it almost never starts with "keep everything lined up prior to the first few tacks"

For me it normally starts with the corner of 2 sheet or plate ends and a single tack. At that point I'm only putting one corner where the 1st tack goes in very close to perfect alignment. The rest of the sheet or plate can over lap or lay open in what ever fashion it takes to get my tack location to align right.  

Then a 2nd tack or more and now we have to sides that can stand on end together.
Once it is tacked enough to hold then move onto putting the 3rd panel  in place with a couple tacks. 
once the 4th panel is in place, now we have something we can square, adjust or take back apart because they are only tacked. 

Adjustment tools,  hammers for hitting directly on tacks, wood for non marring gentle adjustments. 
hammertime.PNG
hammertime.PNG (757.58 KiB) Viewed 9464 times
 
 
 
 
 
starbright55
Donator 25
Posts: 58
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2023 4:46 pm
1

Re: Specmar 4.5 Build

#31

Post by starbright55 »

Thanks - I didn't have to do much banging but it took some creativity to get that first tack line up! I may have to shape a 2x4 for the next round!

I had the console laid on it's side with 0.125 shims holding up the top sheet. I didn't quite line up corner to corner (since the console is made from 0.160") but the offset was 0.035" which is pretty small (0.160" - 0.125"). It was also a little tough because the folded pieces have moved ever so slightly so I need to do some puling to get the top down against the sides.
 
starbright55
Donator 25
Posts: 58
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2023 4:46 pm
1

Re: Specmar 4.5 Build

#32

Post by starbright55 »

PXL_20241218_213244806.jpg
PXL_20241218_213244806.jpg (137.02 KiB) Viewed 6906 times
 
PXL_20241218_213257733.jpg
PXL_20241218_213257733.jpg (151.09 KiB) Viewed 6906 times
 
PXL_20241218_213332217.jpg
PXL_20241218_213332217.jpg (142.5 KiB) Viewed 6906 times
 I have been practicing TIG for when I will want to use it. Still have some "oops" but getting better.  Still have work to do before showtime though...
 
 
 
 
starbright55
Donator 25
Posts: 58
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2023 4:46 pm
1

Re: Specmar 4.5 Build

#33

Post by starbright55 »

Also, tacked up some items this weekend - keel, transom, delta pad/ski. Once I'm happy with the fit up, I will add more tacks to fill in the inbetweens and then dress them with the die grinder.
PXL_20241215_234352189.jpg
PXL_20241215_234352189.jpg (148.94 KiB) Viewed 6905 times
 
PXL_20241215_235306434.jpg
PXL_20241215_235306434.jpg (129.15 KiB) Viewed 6905 times
 
 
 
kmorin
Donator 08, 09, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 21, 22, 23, 24 25
Posts: 1857
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 1:37 am
16
Your location: Kenai, AK
Location: Kenai, Alaska

Re: Specmar 4.5 Build

#34

Post by kmorin »

Star'55,
I don't think this method of fitting and tacking up is nearly as reliable as following every seam in sequence with tightly spaced tacks?  IF the edges are dead-on accurate, and most NC but parts are, then tacking from one end of any seam to its other end will rely on the accuracy of the seams/parts' edges for the shape and fit of the parts. 

For example; If you have a bottom seam with curvature and tacked that seam every 12-16" 'just to get it fit' (so to speak) I think you'd risk having open seam stretches where the material will not be edge to edge- as shown in the plans and designated in the cut files?  If you have exact cuts- then best practice, IMO, is to start at one end, and fit edge-to-edge precisely and tack every few inches precisely and the ends of the material will come to a single meeting point- and you'd tack back from that end by and inch or so. 
starbright55 wrote: Wed Dec 18, 2024 6:04 pm Once I'm happy with the fit up, I will add more tacks to fill in the inbetweens

 
Many parts intersect in weld seams at an angle to each parts' plane.  That means the line of intersection, in 3D, would be best served to line up the cut edges as perfectly as possible and tack in short increments (2-4" max) and not 'go-back' to try to add tacks "inbetweens". Edge-to- edge fit contributes to the cleanest and most uniform weld seams. That method also means the two adjacent parts are fit to a 'knife edge' and therefore any curves are fit to the slightest variation possible- unlike tacking at longer intervals where the 'inbetweens' added later don't allow as perfect an opportunity to get the edges as well aligned for tacking.

Tig Beads: 

Your TIG beads look good, now to work on getting back into the bead or 're-starts' which is where most of us have the least consistency but results in the best looking final beads; once mastered.

Re Tack Up: 

One method that seams to work pretty well for tacking up tanks, consoles, helm/dash board assemblies involves using the https://www.midlandtool.com/itemdetail/PGA20 (example) long reach or "deep reach" style of Vise-grip (tm) or equivalent brand.  I keep a dozen pc.s about 1/2" long/width of 2" x 2" x 1/8" angle that I hold each side with a long reach clamp. Once located inside the seam to be tacked, I clamp the 90 degree plane and move along the seam every few inches to tack.  This seams to work pretty well. 

If I can't get a clamp on the back up angle- I just tack one leg of the short pc of angle to the first side- while the surface of the other leg is held to the plane the adjoining face will need to form. Once tacked, the inside tacks that remain, often don't even need clean up- they're not going to be seen but of course, you can dress them off if you prefer. 

This method works for everything but the 'top' or final side where you can't get inside to clamp the angle back-up's. You can tack in permanent line up parts but not always the best practice inside a tank.  In those cases I put a pc of banding material; thin steel strap over any adjoining corner at 45 deg. This will support the final side and hold it the banding material thickness above the edge of the tank, console or other assembly; while you line it up to tack.  Then pull the banding material and tap the tacks slightly tighter- if you plan to keyhole the weld (tank tops) then leave the gap you plan to pull along with the weld. If you're going to MIG the edges, and router them for finish, then tap the gap tight to the inner edge of the sides of the assembly. 

By following the parts' edges closely and using a sharpened standard screw driver blade to pry open the joint when too tight for a tack... you can pretty smoothly tack up almost all assemblies where they're joined in an outside corner (shown in lots of photos) and keep great control of the seams' fit until its ready to weld.

Just a few more remarks about how to tack up and hopefully justifying my reasoning of why to tack closely as your progress along any seam.

Cheers,
Kevin Morin
Kenai, AK
 
 
kmorin
starbright55
Donator 25
Posts: 58
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2023 4:46 pm
1

Re: Specmar 4.5 Build

#35

Post by starbright55 »

Kevin, again, thank you for the detailed explanation.

I'm trying to follow the Specmar instructions.  The order (so far as I've gotten to) is:
[1] keel to ski/delta pad
[2] transom to keel (this is where the pictures left off in the previous post, #33)
[3] bottom sheets to ski/delta pad up to frame 3 which is just forward of the front of the ski (basically, don't start curving the bottom sheets yet until step 4). 
inst.jpg
inst.jpg (74.2 KiB) Viewed 6362 times
 
So, as you can see in the instructions, I've even tacked closer than every 12".  As the the bottom sheets curve upward, I will need to start getting those tacks really close together, probably in the 2" range like you've suggested.  (my tacks aren't great but they will all be dressed down before any welding commences - I will probably also add more tacks after I am happy with the alignments, fit up, and shape).  So far, it's all lining up perfectly except for the transom is off by a hair  aft of where it should be - no more than 1/32" or so off (the sharpie lines are 1/16" thick).

Carl's thread shows some great ways to force stuff into place, this was my solution.  Single ratchet strap to the rear since the keel is the only thing strong in the rear (3/8" thick) and a strap to each side to bring up the hull sheets incrementally where I will tack as I go.


 
PXL_20241224_005036103.jpg
PXL_20241224_005036103.jpg (153.28 KiB) Viewed 6362 times
 
PXL_20241224_005152675.jpg
PXL_20241224_005152675.jpg (160.27 KiB) Viewed 6362 times
 
 
 
 
 
 
kmorin
Donator 08, 09, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 21, 22, 23, 24 25
Posts: 1857
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 1:37 am
16
Your location: Kenai, AK
Location: Kenai, Alaska

Re: Specmar 4.5 Build

#36

Post by kmorin »

star'55,
looks like the tack up is going well. I see where you're getting the idea of tack spacing but I can't agree except for the T-fillet of the VKB to delta pad.  There the bottom plate doesn't have any force to potentially pull the seam apart but in all the hull seams I'd say that was poor practice due to the curvature of the hull's V.

In this case the seams along the delta pad will become loaded once the bow/forefoot of the stem is pulled in- next step in your photos. 

I'd remarks about your pulling the sheets into the stem, likely you've already found this out?  The post won't hurt but isn't really necessary as you could pull on the VKB in line to the forward chine (outer bottom panel seam). I'd pull from the lowest point of the VKB not the top- the VKB can bend forward in the rig you show.  Pulling from the bottom most 'corner' where the bar goes from keel to stern post, aft lower transom intersection to delta pad would be less prone to bending, even temporarily, of the transom's main vertical bar support which is now un-welded or gusseted.

Usually you need to go back and forth with the two pull directions you've set up. The top Y pull pulls the sheets inward but when that happens the shape can bulge outward at the blue cross strap.  As a result, in order to get this bow/forefoot area tacked cleanly along the rabbet line marked on the VKB,  you end up jockeying back and forth between the two tensions, sometimes pulling too much to get the fit needed- then letting off a little to move to the next tack's fit up.  You can rig the post supported strap to the bottom sheets directly to the bow stem/keel seam inner line- skipping the pull on the chine edge. Same thing will happen- the inner edges of the bottom will pull toward the VKB as you move the pull point up the bowstem.

I wouldn't hesitate to add more straps in the blue direction/tranversely so that the point of pull was more gradual and less 'one point' so to speak. This usually allows less pull on each clamp/strap and more evenly curved bottom panels and an easier fit to the rabbet line. Notice that the blue tension strap can be added many more times and accomplish what the post supported strap is doing?

The pull inward at the chine- post supported Y straps will pull the chine edges in toward the VKB but the lower edge may not fit at the rabbet line? When the lower/keel edge of sheets touch the VKB they may be high or low.  Pulling on the cross chine tension (blue nylon in image) will help shift the cone shape so the lower edges come closer to the rabbet line but sometimes a long bladed standard screw drive may need to be driven/tapped down inside to get the keel edge of the bottom panels to the rabbet line.

Other times tapping up from the bottom is needed when the sheet edge rabbet line is close but the two chine connected strap pulling forces aren't fine enough adjustment?

Since you KNOW for a fact the sheet shapes are a 'perfect fit' to one another I'd suggest nice hot tacks closely spaced so you don't have to face a bow that unzips!  Just my experience; only had one un-zip but when it did I had to clean all the tacks, and redo the work just finished.

Looks good,
 
kmorin
starbright55
Donator 25
Posts: 58
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2023 4:46 pm
1

Re: Specmar 4.5 Build

#37

Post by starbright55 »

A frustrating afternoon.  Not a total unzip but enough that took a LOT of time to undo.

I thought I would be able to just continue where I left off, but somehow, in moving the hull to it's storage position in the garage, I popped a bunch of tacks (the red section separated and opened 1/8" away from the VKB. The side panels to she ski and one tack forward of that were good (green)and also at the bow end, two tacks remained (green).
PXL_20241224_005036103~2.jpg
PXL_20241224_005036103~2.jpg (68.03 KiB) Viewed 6338 times
 

After cutting all tacks and starting over (both sides) from the ski up, I got to about the same place and it happened again in the same manner (port side only - starboard side is still solid). Everything is lining up - the rabbit line and the station lines. Thinking either some 1" stitches or jacking it up off the floor so I could add a few tacks to the bottom. Also, stabilizing the VKB at the bow so it can't wobble like a big lever.

:banghead:
 

 
 
 
kmorin
Donator 08, 09, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 21, 22, 23, 24 25
Posts: 1857
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 1:37 am
16
Your location: Kenai, AK
Location: Kenai, Alaska

Re: Specmar 4.5 Build

#38

Post by kmorin »

Star'55,
I can recall similar frustration when a bow unzipped on me and don't envy the work added to your tack-up.

Couple things seem like they'd be worth discussing.  You're tacking to a heavy bar (VKB) with (to me) unknown open circuit voltage.  SO... I'd want to get off the hull and onto the bench in order to resolve the tacks' holding power to the two parent metals you're working with - bottom and VKB.

First thing I notice is that you have intact mill scale - but then I can't see very well into the area that came undone to determine if you've cleaned the mill scale there? Generally, mill scale (shiny stuff on new sheet aluminum) will melt at much higher temp than the underlying metal. If you don't remove the mill scale prior to tacking- the tack may have a very tenuous hold on the underlying metal.

Next, don't know the open circuit voltage or wire size but I'd want to test that and make sure you're using the largest dia. wire you can get into the gun/feeder you're using.  Don't know the set up, contact tip, liners, settings... and they may all play a part in getting stronger tacks from your system. I'd want to bench test a lot of tacks to see if I could get a little more adhesion?

Not sure if your tacks are breaking/cracking or if they're lifting off the material? IF they're cracking ? what alloy are you using (?) 40 series filler is notorious for weak tacks, where 5356 will hold much more in the same use.  If the tacks crack then they might need more duration or a bit of movement to get the arc-stop away from the tack itself?

Last is heat- is the shop/garage floor warm enough? The VKB and bottom are at whatever temp the shop floor is so if that's not very warm you might heat the VKB and bottom plate with a heat gun or propane torch/weedburner.  If you use flame then keep the torch in a relatively small area until the 'dew' runs, that is; you can see the surface dry out of the condensation of the propane flame.  Propane leaves water on the surface until 200 Deg. F and that's time to move the torch... when the dew runs or condensate evaporates.

Machine and torch settings, Mill Scale removal, and heat of the parent metal parts should all be involved in your bench tests to get better/stronger/longer lasting tacks.

Cheers,
Kevin Morin
Kenai, AK
kmorin
starbright55
Donator 25
Posts: 58
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2023 4:46 pm
1

Re: Specmar 4.5 Build

#39

Post by starbright55 »

I will try to get some tests on the bench and see what I some up with. The tacks themselves aren't cracking- the ball remains on the VKB and the bottom sheet drops down. It's much more adhered to the VKB.  I think I need to be more aggressive in my position of the tack. I usually start on the VKB (3/8") and then drop to the plate (0.160"). I guess I've been thinking lots of heat to the thick part and less to the thin part. I'm gun shy of melting through the thin plate. This is at the limits for a 220V welder (3/8" plate) but since it's going to 0.160" I'm hoping I will be ok. When I start making welds (not just tacks), I plan on preheating. If that's not enough, I could get a helium mix. I don't really want to buy a new machine or have to outsource it as the keel is the majority of the 3/8" used on this boat (there a transom plate, about 16" x 20" and two other short hull stiffeners too).


The mill scale was always heavily brushed off and the area clean. I have some clean up to do now with the old tacks and soot. The plan will be to clean up and remark the rabbit line.


I'm using 0.035" 5356. I felt like it was the most "universal" size (upon my early reading) so that's what I have stocked up on. I have to get gas this week so I will pick up some 0.045" and some bigger contact tips. Maybe I will like it. I have realized I think I prefer 1/8" tig rod over 3/32". Would the 0.035" mig wire be correct for all 0.160" to 0.160" welds?


The garage might be "cold", but I'm in San Diego so I think the ambient temp yesterday in the garage was in the mid-60's (but def need to get gas for the torch to do some preheating).
 
 
kmorin
Donator 08, 09, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 21, 22, 23, 24 25
Posts: 1857
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 1:37 am
16
Your location: Kenai, AK
Location: Kenai, Alaska

Re: Specmar 4.5 Build

#40

Post by kmorin »

star'55,
When tacking to two different thickness metal- you could use a kind or rotating or 'V' shaped movement of your torch hand to help distribute the arc between the two metals.  When tacking one thickness to the same material just a spot will likely heat both at once and fuse them in a tack.

When working between two different thicknesses you might light up and then make a circle with your torch hand, or a wrist movement, to direct the arc onto both pc. individually. The idea being to 'wet' or melt each pc separately.  I'm not suggesting the tack will be very long in duration but that each 'side' of the tack might be more directly aimed at that half of the joint?

Not sure if you set your power supply to large dia. wire would the open circuit voltage go UP?? If you're saying the tacks are holding to the VKB fine, and releasing from the 0.160/ 5/32" material; then I think its likely more an 'angle of the torch' issue over open circuit voltage? Still needs testing on the bench.

0.035" wire's max wattage is lower than 0.045" wire's so you can carry more welding power on the larger wire- with some practice you'd get "hotter" tacks with bigger wire.

IF the shop is ambient 60F then its not preheating time!! that's warm for many shops. 

Re; Correct wire size.
I'm not sure we could get much of a consensus on "correct" size in regard 0.035" & 0.045"?  I think you can weld 0.160 with either wire and get a decent weld.  You'd have to bench them both and set up a few coupons to see which would give YOU the best beads?  I like the extra wattage that the larger wire will carry so I can 'burn in' when I need to.  However, many welders prefer smaller dia. wire since they can usually travel slower. 

You'll have to set up some bench tests incorporating your hull's seam geometry and your seam prep and learn which wire gives you the best results.  Remember to 'salt'/temper/provide context for my remarks with my experience. Although I did weld hundreds of skiffs and a few larger power boats, I used push-pull guns (Cobramatic from MK Products) and almost exclusively worked with 0.045" wire in water cooled guns trying to get extremely hot, very small, narrow beads about as fast as I could. My point of view is informed by that work- the first few skiff builds are a pretty distant memory.

Testing with your welding power supply and wire feeder is critically important to obtain good results for your build.

Cheers,
Kevin Morin
Kenai, AK
kmorin
m32825
Donator 24
Posts: 211
Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2023 5:51 pm
1

Re: Specmar 4.5 Build

#41

Post by m32825 »

My VKB tacks were with .045 wire at the highest wire feed the gun will do, in the 480ipm range. Gun angle was dead into the joint at 45 degrees, then angled a little more into the VKB than the panel. I'd position the tip of the wire touching where the pieces meet then back out along the gun angle a millimeter or so, favoring the VKB side a little before initiating. I wanted the arc to start on the VKB then quickly wash up onto the plate. I used .3s duration for single panel tacks, and .6s or .7s when tacking both panels at the same time. I also kept a clamp behind where I was working to limit how much I could lose if something unzipped. Like mountain climbing, how far do you want to fall? I have .125" panels and never had an issue with burning through. Do some bench testing and see what it takes to intentionally burn through.

    -- Carl
 
m32825
Donator 24
Posts: 211
Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2023 5:51 pm
1

Re: Specmar 4.5 Build

#42

Post by m32825 »

Some samples from near my bow, once I got my routine down.
IMG_20250108_090951286_copy_1280x686.jpg
IMG_20250108_090951286_copy_1280x686.jpg (37.76 KiB) Viewed 6112 times
 
IMG_20250108_090924424_copy_1280x720.jpg
IMG_20250108_090924424_copy_1280x720.jpg (36.59 KiB) Viewed 6112 times
 
 
starbright55
Donator 25
Posts: 58
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2023 4:46 pm
1

Re: Specmar 4.5 Build

#43

Post by starbright55 »

kmorin wrote: Tue Jan 07, 2025 10:48 pm star'55,
When tacking to two different thickness metal- you could use a kind or rotating or 'V' shaped movement of your torch hand to help distribute the arc between the two metals.  When tacking one thickness to the same material just a spot will likely heat both at once and fuse them in a tack.

When working between two different thicknesses you might light up and then make a circle with your torch hand, or a wrist movement, to direct the arc onto both pc. individually. The idea being to 'wet' or melt each pc separately.  I'm not suggesting the tack will be very long in duration but that each 'side' of the tack might be more directly aimed at that half of the joint?


 
I will try and make some wider & flatter tacks to see what happens (versus just having material build up which is what happens now).  I was hoping that staying one place, things would heat up and penetrate deeper but that is obviously not working.
kmorin wrote: Tue Jan 07, 2025 10:48 pm
Not sure if you set your power supply to large dia. wire would the open circuit voltage go UP?? If you're saying the tacks are holding to the VKB fine, and releasing from the 0.160/ 5/32" material; then I think its likely more an 'angle of the torch' issue over open circuit voltage? Still needs testing on the bench.

0.035" wire's max wattage is lower than 0.045" wire's so you can carry more welding power on the larger wire- with some practice you'd get "hotter" tacks with bigger wire.

I'm not sure we could get much of a consensus on "correct" size in regard 0.035" & 0.045"?  I think you can weld 0.160 with either wire and get a decent weld.  You'd have to bench them both and set up a few coupons to see which would give YOU the best beads?  I like the extra wattage that the larger wire will carry so I can 'burn in' when I need to.  However, many welders prefer smaller dia. wire since they can usually travel slower. 


 
The spec sheet says open circuit voltage of 75V.

Preprogrammed, the machine has settings for:
0.035" synergic 22GA - 1/4"
0.035" single pulse 20GA - 1/4"
0.045" synergic 18GA - 5/16"
0.045" single pulse 20GA - 3/8"
I've only used 0.035" so far and I can't remember what the details were exactly - thinking 600 ipm and 25V or so?

I went to two welding stores looking for 0.045" (well, gas shops that carry welding supplies) and neither had what I needed.  Lot's of 4043, 16 lb spools, and 0.035" but not the combination that I need.  I've got 0.045" on order (really, it's 3/64" which is almost 0.047").

I think you are right, it's probably a gun angle issue. 
kmorin wrote: Tue Jan 07, 2025 10:48 pm
I'm not sure we could get much of a consensus on "correct" size in regard 0.035" & 0.045"?  I think you can weld 0.160 with either wire and get a decent weld.  You'd have to bench them both and set up a few coupons to see which would give YOU the best beads?  I like the extra wattage that the larger wire will carry so I can 'burn in' when I need to.  However, many welders prefer smaller dia. wire since they can usually travel slower. 


 
I still like the idea of 0.045" especially in fillets.  I always seemed to have trouble "filling up" the corner.
 
starbright55
Donator 25
Posts: 58
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2023 4:46 pm
1

Re: Specmar 4.5 Build

#44

Post by starbright55 »

m32825 wrote: Wed Jan 08, 2025 7:58 am My VKB tacks were with .045 wire at the highest wire feed the gun will do, in the 480ipm range. Gun angle was dead into the joint at 45 degrees, then angled a little more into the VKB than the panel. I'd position the tip of the wire touching where the pieces meet then back out along the gun angle a millimeter or so, favoring the VKB side a little before initiating. I wanted the arc to start on the VKB then quickly wash up onto the plate. I used .3s duration for single panel tacks, and .6s or .7s when tacking both panels at the same time. I also kept a clamp behind where I was working to limit how much I could lose if something unzipped. Like mountain climbing, how far do you want to fall? I have .125" panels and never had an issue with burning through. Do some bench testing and see what it takes to intentionally burn through.

    -- Carl
 




 
Thanks Carl.  I don't have a tack function and I feel like I'm going to at least 1 sec  per tack though.  Yeah, I've never burned through either, it just seems to mound up (maxed 0.035").  Because my hull is sort of "stitch and glue" construction and not built over frames, things get wobbly which has caused my tacks to break (moving it/repositioning or bumping the keel).  I lost the other side this morning and now I'm back to square one. The panels are long lever arms and I don't have anything to clamp to.  Every time I tighten or loosen a strap, there's some shuddering.
 
 
 
starbright55
Donator 25
Posts: 58
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2023 4:46 pm
1

Re: Specmar 4.5 Build

#45

Post by starbright55 »

m32825 wrote: Wed Jan 08, 2025 8:14 am Some samples from near my bow, once I got my routine down.
 
 

 
Your tacks look pretty solid!
 
starbright55
Donator 25
Posts: 58
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2023 4:46 pm
1

Re: Specmar 4.5 Build

#46

Post by starbright55 »

The following is a "bench test" from Monday (before reading Kevin's latest post).  I didn't write down the setting (but should note them next time).  Again, this is the machine maxed out with 0.035".  I tried to match the angle of the bottom plate to the VKB.  I felt like I had to pull pretty hard to break it but didn't use pliers.  Adhesion is definitely not great.  More bench testing to come.
t1a.jpg
t1a.jpg (131.09 KiB) Viewed 6072 times
 
t1b.jpg
t1b.jpg (136.47 KiB) Viewed 6072 times
 
t1c.jpg
t1c.jpg (144.69 KiB) Viewed 6072 times
 
 
 
m32825
Donator 24
Posts: 211
Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2023 5:51 pm
1

Re: Specmar 4.5 Build

#47

Post by m32825 »

Compared to mine, your tacks are more of an inside corner, which would need more heat. I've been running at 19v. Show us what your ground clamp looks like?
starbright55
Donator 25
Posts: 58
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2023 4:46 pm
1

Re: Specmar 4.5 Build

#48

Post by starbright55 »

Yes, more of an inside corner since I need to tack up the bottom plates from the inside.

Here's my ground clamp (and all those tacks in the picture have broken too)
groundclamp.jpg
groundclamp.jpg (35.23 KiB) Viewed 5992 times
 
 
kmorin
Donator 08, 09, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 21, 22, 23, 24 25
Posts: 1857
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 1:37 am
16
Your location: Kenai, AK
Location: Kenai, Alaska

Re: Specmar 4.5 Build

#49

Post by kmorin »

star'55,
That type of work lead clamp can be a problem in getting full voltage to the wire-to-work-pc. arc.  The reason is the mill scale under the contact pad has a high resistance so the arc has to spend a part of a second 'burning' through the mill scale and also the surface of those pads in the spring type clamp. Both levels of resistance reduce the effect of the open circuit voltage to establish a welding arc.

IF that were true, as is often the case with this type clamp, there will be little (very small) arc pits on the parent metal under the contact pads and there will be corresponding pits on the surface of the contact blocks inside the spring clamp's jaws.  This micro-arcing (I think it's called?) takes lots of the open circuit voltage to complete the circuit before there's a welding arc.

I personally don't use this type of work lead clamp preferring to take the copper lug off the clamp's connection and bolt it to a pc. of sanded smooth aluminum which I then Vise-grip (tm) to a mill scale cleaned area of the work to be welded. Even in this much tighter prepped connection I've seen pitting due to micro-arcing, so; I periodically sand the sacrificial pc of aluminum which will clamp to the work. 

I use 2"x2"x1/4" angle with the work lead's copper lug (which MUST be soldered not just crimped inside the lug) to one leg of the 2" long pc of angle extrusion and the other leg as the clamp surface.

I think it would be good practice to make this type of work lead connection to your welding material for both MIG and TIG as tacks' fusion are very affected by the open circuit voltage duration which is often being dissipated into the bridging arc needed to get an actual weld closed circuit in instances where the work lead's contact is high resistance.

Just a note about the work lead clamp shown, compared to what I've seen in most boat shops and use as standard practice.  This is probably one of the reasons Carl asked your about the 'ground' clamp a post above?

Cheers,
Kevin Morin
Kenai, AK
kmorin
starbright55
Donator 25
Posts: 58
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2023 4:46 pm
1

Re: Specmar 4.5 Build

#50

Post by starbright55 »

Wow - I have no idea that there is a better work clamp out there. My first step will be just brushing the mil scale off where I clamp and see where I go with 3/64" wire.

I was able to load some 3/64" wire this morning and do one tack on the bench. I'm happy to report that in a break test, that one tack felt stronger and harder to break than the piece with three tacks, above, I like it already!  More testing to be done this weekend (hopefully).
 
Post Reply Previous topicNext topic